Moskvich





Origin: RU Russia

Founder ?

Years of Activity 1946-2002, 2022-present

Parent Company ?

Headquarters Moscow, Russia

Advertising

  • Discontinued Production

    1991-1995 Moskvich 2141 4x4
    1988-1995 Moskvich 2141 Aleko-Rally A6
    1974-1976 Moskvich G5M
    1968-1973 Moskvich G5
    1963-1972 Moskvich G4
    1962-1965 Moskvich 407 Coupe
    1961-1965 Moskvich G3
    1953-1965 Moskvich 404 Sport
    1955-1963 Moskvich G1
    1958-1962 Moskvich 407 Rally
    1957-1960 Moskvich SA
    1956-1960 Moskvich G2

    Comments

    Author Message


    NL Desscythe17

    2023-02-09 20:12
    SolanaBogon wrote

    You could rename the main page and I'm willing to edit manually the individual entries

    There you go :)
    FR SolanaBogon

    2023-02-09 19:32
    Desscythe17 wrote
    I would be fine with changing it, but I don't know if the system will recognize it for everything.

    You could rename the main page and I'm willing to edit manually the individual entries


    NL Desscythe17

    2023-02-08 15:08
    I would be fine with changing it, but I don't know if the system will recognize it for everything.

    -- Last edit: 2023-02-08 15:08:46
    FR SolanaBogon

    2023-02-07 09:24
    Why "Moskvitch", and not "Moskvich", without the "t"? Not only it is the correct English transcription of cyrillic "Москвич", but it is also how they spell it on brochures (at least English ones) and export badges:

    www.autominded.net/brochure/div9/1969%20Moskvich%2006.jpg



    -- Last edit: 2023-02-07 09:25:33


    QA JFK

    2015-11-11 14:56
    Desscythe17 wrote

    The English translation should be exactly the way you hear it. So if you hear a v-sound instead of a w-sound, it should be Moskvitch. It might be similar to the centuries-old debate about "vodka" or "wodka".

    That may be the problem. In czech language, V and W have exactly same pronounciation.
    But as I thought about it more, I think I somehow get it now (and thanks to IGCD member krq9), because english W sounds similar to mine U, so it would sound more oddly.

    -- Last edit: 2015-11-11 14:57:11


    NL Desscythe17

    2015-11-11 10:31
    JFK wrote

    If am I not mistaken, cyrilic alphabet doesnt have W at all. I must say though, Moscow would look oddly with normal V, but that is only habit. In fact, I dont see reason why they did W either.

    For sure it looks odd when we are using W in city name and V in car name. It should be either all W, or all V.

    You might be overthinking it. The English translation should be exactly the way you hear it. So if you hear a v-sound instead of a w-sound, it should be Moskvitch. It might be similar to the centuries-old debate about "vodka" or "wodka".


    QA JFK

    2015-11-10 23:37
    fck wrote

    Can't find why we're using 'w' in Moscow, but this is an exception. в is a 'v' in every cyrillic-english transcription standard. Why not 'Moskva'? Because in XII century this city was called "Moskov".

    If am I not mistaken, cyrilic alphabet doesnt have W at all. I must say though, Moscow would look oddly with normal V, but that is only habit. In fact, I dont see reason why they did W either.

    For sure it looks odd when we are using W in city name and V in car name. It should be either all W, or all V.


    PL fck

    2015-11-10 23:31
    [quote=JFK]Who came up with bright idea to translate it as Moskvich? It is derived from Moscow, so Moskwich would be more suitable.
    (If it is not clear - it is not mistake done by anyone here, but someone who translated it in cold war)[/quote

    Can't find why we're using 'w' in Moscow, but this is an exception. в is a 'v' in every cyrillic-english transcription standard. Why not 'Moskva'? Because in XII century this city was called "Moskov".


    QA JFK

    2015-11-10 21:17
    Who came up with bright idea to translate it as Moskvich? It is derived from Moscow, so Moskwich would be more suitable.
    (If it is not clear - it is not mistake done by anyone here, but someone who translated it in cold war)

    Add a comment

    You must login to post comments...