Advertising
Petrol | ||||
2.5 Subaru EJ25 | 165hp / 121kW | 2004-2005 | ||
2.5 Subaru EJ25 | 170hp / 125kW | 2005-2006 | ||
2.0 Subaru EJ20 Turbo | 227hp / 167kW | 2004-2005 | ||
2.5 Subaru EJ25 Turbo | 230hp / 169kW | 2005-2006 |
Comments
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() 2015-12-08 04:15 | Probably one of the best examples of badge engineering ever. Not everyone liked the front styling of this generation of Impreza over it's years of production, and this gave customers a great alternative. Also being a GM brand at the time, I'm pretty sure it had better powertrain coverage than the Subaru conterpart (5 year, 100,000 miles, compared to 5 years, 60,000 for the Subaru). Only major disadvantage I'm aware of was a smaller dealer network than Subaru, though it could be serviced at a Subaru dealer. |
![]() ![]() 2015-12-07 23:05 | JFK wrote Well, I can copy motor, delete vmax and fuel consumption, and just change transmission, right? Because I really didnt found anything (apart from fact that automatic transmission was for extra 1250$). Yes and delete the weight, as that's the only relevant thing that changes for automatic transmissions. |
![]() ![]() 2015-12-07 23:02 | Desscythe17 wrote According to wikipedia, all trims had automatic versions, so it's important that you find information for them. Well, I can copy motor, delete vmax and fuel consumption, and just change transmission, right? Because I really didnt found anything (apart from fact that automatic transmission was for extra 1250$). |
![]() ![]() 2015-12-07 23:00 | JFK wrote I just done the engines with manual transmission ![]() According to wikipedia, all trims had automatic versions, so it's important that you find information for them. |
![]() ![]() 2015-12-07 21:04 | Rinspeed wrote there isn't automatic version? I just done the engines with manual transmission ![]() -- Last edit: 2015-12-07 21:09:18 |
![]() ![]() 2015-12-07 20:58 | there isn't automatic version? |
Add a comment
You must login to post comments...