Comments
| Related page | Author | Message |
|---|---|---|
 |   Lancia
2020-05-05 01:17 | What a monstrosity... Looks like a cross between a Pontiac and a BMW. -- Last edit: 2020-05-05 01:18:43 |
|   Desscythe17
2020-05-04 10:56 | Maki wrote Does the V6 Galant really deserve its own page? Other than the taillights, I don't see any differences between it and the 4-cylinder model. To me different taillights are always sufficient to create a separate page. |
|   Maki
2020-05-04 06:17 | Does the V6 Galant really deserve its own page? Other than the taillights, I don't see any differences between it and the 4-cylinder model. |
 | Desscythe17
2017-12-02 11:42 | Nothing says "business is booming" like copying the grille of a Russian car... www.webcarstory.com/voiture.php?id=30229 P.S. I originally meant this as a joke, but after some research, the oldest Lada concept I could find with this grille was from 2012, whereas the oldest Mitsubishi concept with the same detail was from 2013. |
 | Desscythe17
2016-04-09 08:40 | carcrasher88 wrote Gotta say, it looks like Mitsubishi has really done a great job with this refresh. Kinda looks as if it should have been like this in the first place. But, I guess it was probably smart for them to start the way they did see how well the car would do, before deciding if it was worth updating it. Fortunately, the Mirage has been selling pretty well in the US market. I've been seeing quite a few around myself. And, if these updates are really as much of an improvement as they say they are, I imagine this and the new sedan version will sell even better. Oh, it's still extremely cheap. It just tries to hide it better. -- Last edit: 2016-04-09 09:26:48 |
|
 carcrasher88
2016-04-09 00:39 | Gotta say, it looks like Mitsubishi has really done a great job with this refresh. Kinda looks as if it should have been like this in the first place. But, I guess it was probably smart for them to start the way they did see how well the car would do, before deciding if it was worth updating it. Fortunately, the Mirage has been selling pretty well in the US market. I've been seeing quite a few around myself. And, if these updates are really as much of an improvement as they say they are, I imagine this and the new sedan version will sell even better. |
 | Desscythe17
2016-02-29 10:45 | Discontinued in the United States in 2014. Received the same facelift as the sedan for 2015/2016 in Canada. |
 |   JFK
2016-02-03 22:54 | Desscythe17 wrote Thanks .gif ":)") Youre welcome |
| Desscythe17
2016-02-03 22:50 | JFK wrote Thanks |
| JFK
2016-02-03 22:02 | front pic is finished |
| JFK
2016-02-03 21:35 | Desscythe17 wrote That actually makes it a bit better, would you like to do the same for the front picture? commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mitsubishi_Galant_(5th_generation)#/media/File:1985_Mitsubishi_Galant_base_2.4_(E17A)_front.jpg At least I will have placeholder pictures until I stumble upon official pictures or pictures of a car in a better state. Yeah, I dont anything better to do in the evening anyways |
| Desscythe17
2016-02-03 21:34 | JFK wrote Aside from not very well done rear fender arch that I pretty much made from scratch, it is not a bad shot for 45 minute job - picture That actually makes it a bit better, would you like to do the same for the front picture? commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mitsubishi_Galant_(5th_generation)#/media/File:1985_Mitsubishi_Galant_base_2.4_(E17A)_front.jpg At least I will have placeholder pictures until I stumble upon official pictures or pictures of a car in a better state. |
| JFK
2016-02-03 21:15 | Desscythe17 wrote Well I don't know how it will look, but I would thank you for trying. Aside from not very well done rear fender arch that I pretty much made from scratch, it is not a bad shot for 45 minute job - picture -- Last edit: 2016-02-03 21:25:55 |
| Desscythe17
2016-02-03 20:35 | JFK wrote Will you say it is a decent pic if I can get the rust retouched? I will try and I post my result. Well I don't know how it will look, but I would thank you for trying. |
| JFK
2016-02-03 20:32 | Desscythe17 wrote Facelifted in 1986, but I can't find decent pre-facelift pictures. Will you say it is a decent pic if I can get the rust retouched? I will try and I post my result. |
| Desscythe17
2016-02-03 19:44 | Facelifted in 1986, but I can't find decent pre-facelift pictures. upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/1985_Mitsubishi_Galant_base_2.4_%28E17A%29_rear.jpg Note the different taillights. -- Last edit: 2016-02-03 19:45:33 |
 | Desscythe17
2015-10-08 17:23 | Called Mitsubishi Galant Σ for the 1988 model year. |
 | Desscythe17
2015-10-07 17:06 | JFK wrote I can be wrong, but this was proably sold in europe as Space Wagon. Not sure about the LRV version though. And I found out that there was japan only turbocharged limited edition called Resort Runner GT. The LRV was sold as Space Runner in Europe. The Resort Runner GT had the Lancer Evo/Galant VR-4 engine at that time. Why? Because why not. -- Last edit: 2015-10-07 17:08:09 |
| JFK
2015-10-07 16:48 | I can be wrong, but this was proably sold in europe as Space Wagon. Not sure about the LRV version though. And I found out that there was japan only turbocharged limited edition called Resort Runner GT. |
 | Desscythe17
2015-10-01 17:22 | JFK wrote Well USA is (at least in the eyes of eastern coutries) area with tougher requiments. Yes exactly, and expectations are completely different as well. In the US, if a car stays the same for too long (and especially in a highly competitive sedan segment), people won't buy it anymore because they know they can get something better, and are willing to pay for it. In India on the other hand, people want a car they can afford with some basic options. As most people there will never buy a fully equipped car, it's not necessary to keep updating a car. What Mitsubishi did with the Lancer is a strange move. It doesn't seem the right market for such an action (especially if you consider the Lancer has disappeared from the Japanese market, where something like this occurs more often), and it wasn't that popular compared to its competition anyway. Of course, I have no actual experience with American or Indian consumers, but I'm just judging on the basis of key trends for those markets. |
| JFK
2015-10-01 16:37 | carcrasher88 wrote Well, when you consider the Russians, Indians, and Chinese have been getting decades out of older car designs, anything's possible with just the right amount of updating. Well USA is (at least in the eyes of eastern coutries) area with tougher requiments. In Russia, you need to have tough car (as I say, every soviet car is more or less suitable for off-roading) with no eletrical gadgets, So what you would update, when you have cheap car that can ride on 76 octane petrol with lot of spare parts and easy to repair... That is why are eastern new car markets filled with slightly or not at all updated vehicles that run production more than 15 years. But europeans see USA as a country that proably needs modern cars with newest and coolest gadgets. That is proably why Desscythe17 was curious about the fact that car this old is still slightly facelifted than replaced by new model. But yes, it is fact that USA is a country that was able to produce sport car with solid rear axle in 21st century, and not that much things objectively changed in US market. |
|
carcrasher88
2015-10-01 02:46 | Well, when you consider the Russians, Indians, and Chinese have been getting decades out of older car designs, anything's possible with just the right amount of updating. Plus, most auto journalists consider the Mirage to be a car from the 90's in a modern world that is actually selling decently, so why not? |
| Desscythe17
2015-09-30 20:50 | If you believe it, the Lancer has been facelifted for the US-market for 2016. They seem to think they can get even more out of a 8 year old car. |
 |   Mark0
2015-09-29 17:31 | Desscythe17 wrote Strange, it was there before.. I'll change it to O Connell instead. You can add ` it work with it. |
| Desscythe17
2015-09-29 17:17 | Rinspeed wrote the problem was form the ' in Dave O'Connel (i will see the problem with the update) Strange, it was there before.. I'll change it to O Connell instead. |
|   Rinspeed
2015-09-29 15:09 | the problem was form the ' in Dave O'Connel (i will see the problem with the update) |
| Desscythe17
2015-09-29 12:11 | When I try to remove [PS] from this car, the site gives me this error: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'Connell',vehicle_design2 = NULL,vehicle_design3 = NULL,vehicle_design4 = NULL,ve' at line 1 update car_s1 SET vehicle_chassis = NULL,vehicle_make = 'Mitsubishi',vehicle_make2 = '',vehicle_model = 'Endeavor',vehicle_model2 = NULL,vehicle_model3 = NULL,vehicle_number = NULL,vehicle_presentation = NULL,vehicle_design1 = 'Dave O'Connell',vehicle_design2 = NULL,vehicle_design3 = NULL,vehicle_design4 = NULL,vehicle_mk = NULL,vehicle_year = 2003,vehicle_year2 = 2005,vehicle_class = 7,vehicle_origin = 'JP',vehicle_madefor = NULL,m1 = 0,m2 = 0,m3 = 0,m4 = 1,m5 = 0,m6 = 0,m7 = 2,m8 = 2,m9 = 0,m10 = 0,m11 = 0,m12 = 2,m13 = 0,m14 = 0,m15 = 0,m16 = 0,m17 = 0,m18 = 0,m19 = 0,m20 = 0,m21 = 0,m22 = 0,m23 = 2,m24 = 1,c4 = 'Desscythe17',c5 = 'Desscythe17',c6 = NULL,c7 = 'Desscythe17',c8 = NULL,c9 = NULL,c10 = 'Desscythe17',c11 = NULL,c12 = 'Desscythe17',c13 = NULL,c14 = NULL,c15 = NULL,c16 = NULL,c17 = 'Desscythe17',c18 = 'Desscythe17',c19 = 'Desscythe17',c20 = NULL,cm1 = NULL,cm2 = NULL,cm3 = NULL,cm4 = 'Desscythe17',cm5 = NULL,cm6 = NULL,cm7 = 'Desscythe17',cm8 = 'Desscythe17',cm9 = NULL,cm10 = NULL,cm11 = NULL,cm12 = 'Desscythe17',cm13 = NULL,cm14 = NULL,cm15 = NULL,cm16 = NULL,cm17 = NULL,cm18 = NULL,cm19 = NULL,cm20 = NULL,cm21 = NULL,cm22 = NULL,cm23 = 'Desscythe17',cm24 = 'Desscythe17',bc4 = 0,bc5 = 0,bc6 = 0,bc7 = 0,bc8 = 0,bc9 = 0,bc10 = 0,bc11 = 0,bc12 = 0,bc13 = 0,bc14 = 0,bc15 = 0,bc16 = 0,bc17 = 0,bc18 = 0,bc19 = 0,bc20 = 0,bcm1 = 0,bcm2 = 0,bcm3 = 0,bcm4 = 0,bcm5 = 0,bcm6 = 0,bcm7 = 0,bcm8 = 0,bcm9 = 0,bcm10 = 0,bcm11 = 0,bcm12 = 0,bcm13 = 0,bcm14 = 0,bcm15 = 0,bcm16 = 0,bcm17 = 0,bcm18 = 0,bcm19 = 0,bcm20 = 0,bcm21 = 0,bcm22 = 0,bcm23 = 0,bcm24 = 0,date = '2015-09-29 12:10' WHERE vehicle_id = 17829 limit 1 |
| Rinspeed
2015-09-28 22:08 | Desscythe17 wrote It's a bit more than a week, but could you change it? done |
 | Desscythe17
2015-09-28 21:45 | Sales started in Canada in 2008, USA got it in 2009. -- Last edit: 2015-09-29 10:41:11 |
| Desscythe17
2015-09-28 21:09 | Rinspeed wrote yes but i can't now, i was in holiday, not in my home. Tell me in one week if i don't remember it It's a bit more than a week, but could you change it? |
| Rinspeed
2015-04-27 17:46 | Desscythe17 wrote I can't add that this is the 5th generation Lancer, as it changes it to "Evolution V". Could this be changed in the programming? yes but i can't now, i was in holiday, not in my home. Tell me in one week if i don't remember it |
| Desscythe17
2015-04-27 17:40 | I can't add that this is the 5th generation Lancer, as it changes it to "Evolution V". Could this be changed in the programming? |
 |
 Mieguy
2013-07-02 11:35 | looks like the car that actually raced had no rear spoiler. because all pictures from Pikes Peak 2012 show this car without rear spoiler. |
 | Desscythe17
2012-08-22 07:57 | it is lv50, the score you have is divided by 100 which becomes your level. -- Last edit: 2012-08-22 07:57:45 |
|
 Ford78
2012-08-21 21:59 | 100? Wasn´t it supposed to be level 50? |
| Rinspeed
2012-08-21 20:10 | level= points/100 so more than 4000pts |
| Desscythe17
2012-08-21 20:10 | thank you fck! @Ford78: add information and you'll find out .gif ";)") |
|
Ford78
2012-08-21 20:00 | How much I need for level 40? |
|   fck
2012-08-21 19:53 | Desscythe17 wrote whoops, I'm an admin now  Congratulations.  |
| Desscythe17
2012-08-21 19:09 | Rinspeed wrote you forget to modify the engine (years) ;-) whoops, I'm an admin now |
| Rinspeed
2012-08-21 18:23 | you forget to modify the engine (years) ;-) |
#/media/File:1985_Mitsubishi_Galant_base_2.4_(E17A)_front.jpg){kind=link}
