Comments
Related page | Author | Message |
---|---|---|
![]() ![]() 2016-06-24 16:47 | JFK wrote I think that everybody in our community hope also the same thing ![]() we will see if some play at the championship or not ;-). | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-24 16:38 | Rinspeed wrote I hope we hadn't work 6 months on it for nothing. I think that everybody in our community hope also the same thing ![]() | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-24 16:25 | JFK wrote IGCD Rally Raid car ![]() yes ;-) i think we will touch the end of development of it. My friend had solve some problems but there is always a big problem to solve. I hope we hadn't work 6 months on it for nothing. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-24 16:21 | IGCD Rally Raid car ![]() | |
![]() ![]() 2016-06-18 00:20 | This car was actually first car that I didnt recognised few years back when I saw it in person. I saw it from quite a distance from back, but I think it was LHD individual import. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-09 09:38 | JFK wrote WARNING - BAD PUN AHEAD Buick will not survive the new century anyways Shots fired, I believe it will depend on the Chinese economy though, since Buick mainly sells in China. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-09 01:12 | Gamer wrote But Buick already holds the rights to the New Century name. ![]() WARNING - BAD PUN AHEAD Buick will not survive the new century anyways | |
![]() ![]() 2016-05-08 22:30 | Gamer wrote But Buick already holds the rights to the New Century name. ![]() Maybe not in Japan, and the Century is JDM only anyway. | |
![]() 2016-05-08 19:32 | But Buick already holds the rights to the New Century name. ![]() | |
![]() 2016-03-25 13:03 | In this day and age, this car's name is most unfortunate... | |
![]() ![]() 2016-01-15 10:36 | I will add better pictures when season starts. | |
![]() ![]() 2015-12-10 18:08 | Rinspeed wrote no okay | |
![]() ![]() 2015-12-10 17:57 | JFK wrote I think that this is one of few cars, that are left intact for nearly two decades. By the way, is there any way to find out what car is on WCS oldest and it is still in production? no | |
![]() ![]() 2015-12-10 16:30 | I think that this is one of few cars, that are left intact for nearly two decades. By the way, is there any way to find out what car is on WCS oldest and it is still in production? | |
![]() 2015-12-08 22:12 | Changed the drivetrain, it's based on the RWD Hilux platform, not a FWD setup. | |
![]() ![]() 2015-12-03 21:28 | Nice. Like a modern Honda S-Series. | |
![]() ![]() 2015-08-19 10:02 | carcrasher88 wrote Also, shouldn't '30th Anniversary' be added to the name? I mean, it's right there on the fender badge and the spare tire cover. They always mentioned it as Land Cruiser on the official site, but I might add 30th Anniversary to second name or something. | |
![]() 2015-08-19 05:30 | Also, shouldn't '30th Anniversary' be added to the name? I mean, it's right there on the fender badge and the spare tire cover. | |
![]() 2015-07-28 01:48 | Another case of promotional images using California plate numbers that end up actually used years later. The top one, 5KWL859, currently belongs to a 1999 Mitsubishi Diamante. The bottom one, 2KWL853 is not currently in use. -- Last edit: 2015-07-28 01:49:12 | |
![]() ![]() 2015-07-14 21:41 | Mieguy wrote You can also use pictures from this site: www.reallyloud.co.uk/ I already talked to the sites owner and he allows the useage of his photos, but the link to his page has to appear in the photos. "Have a look around and feel free to distribute, link and share. But please keep my website water mark on it." www.reallyloud.co.uk/?page_id=15254 Nice! I think that will help with older European cars. If possible however, it's always better to use official pictures. | |
![]() 2015-07-14 20:45 | You can also use pictures from this site: www.reallyloud.co.uk/ I already talked to the sites owner and he allows the useage of his photos, but the link to his page has to appear in the photos. "Have a look around and feel free to distribute, link and share. But please keep my website water mark on it." www.reallyloud.co.uk/?page_id=15254 -- Last edit: 2015-07-14 20:45:30 | |
![]() 2015-06-02 04:23 | Pretty much the predecessor to the Estima Hybrid, introduced in June 2001. Same hybrid system, 2.4 liter engine, CVT, and 4 wheel drive. | |
![]() ![]() 2015-04-24 23:52 | Rinspeed wrote not hybrid??? I always forget that. | |
![]() ![]() 2015-04-24 23:34 | not hybrid??? | |
![]() ![]() 2015-03-11 09:21 | Mark0 wrote Thank you. I don't want new page for it i just asked because it look so much better in front picture. When I eventually get to Toyota, I'll change the rear picture to be the turbo variant as well if I can find it. | |
![]() ![]() 2015-03-11 07:52 | Desscythe17 wrote The front is of a 2.5 GT Twin Turbo, the rear is of a 2.0 Avante. I don't think a spoiler makes for enough difference to allow it an additional page though. Thank you. I don't want new page for it i just asked because it look so much better in front picture. | |
![]() ![]() 2015-03-10 22:52 | Mark0 wrote Anyone know what version is on the front picture? I think it say Twin Turbo on rear door. The front is of a 2.5 GT Twin Turbo, the rear is of a 2.0 Avante. I don't think a spoiler makes for enough difference to allow it an additional page though. | |
![]() ![]() 2015-03-10 21:30 | Anyone know what version is on the front picture? I think it say Twin Turbo on rear door. | |
![]() ![]() 2015-01-20 01:13 | carcrasher88 wrote Was this unveiled with the Aqua nameplate before or after it was unveiled as the Prius C? If it was shown as Aqua first, I don't know what to list as presentation. If it was shown as the Prius C first, then it would be the 2014 Los Angeles International Auto Show, or simply 2014 Los Angeles, because that's where Toyota showed it with the US-spec Prius C nameplate. It was revealed as Toyota Aqua a couple of months before it was revealed as Toyota Prius C. | |
![]() 2015-01-19 23:44 | Was this unveiled with the Aqua nameplate before or after it was unveiled as the Prius C? If it was shown as Aqua first, I don't know what to list as presentation. If it was shown as the Prius C first, then it would be the 2014 Los Angeles International Auto Show, or simply 2014 Los Angeles, because that's where Toyota showed it with the US-spec Prius C nameplate. | |
![]() ![]() 2014-11-23 23:36 | Rinspeed wrote another horrible looking car... Yes, apparently terrible design and environmentally friendly are somehow connected... | |
![]() ![]() 2014-11-23 22:38 | another horrible looking car... | |
![]() ![]() 2014-11-23 13:15 | sajmon14 wrote wrong dash pic, has a Subaru logo i390.photobucket.com/albums/oo344/sajmon14/11252D1A-0E84-47D9-85C2-4122633CF236_zpss8y3quk4.jpg This is a proper one I just uploaded the wrong file, don't worry. | |
![]() ![]() 2014-11-23 13:10 | wrong dash pic, has a Subaru logo i390.photobucket.com/albums/oo344/sajmon14/11252D1A-0E84-47D9-85C2-4122633CF236_zpss8y3quk4.jpg This is a proper one -- Last edit: 2014-11-23 13:13:08 | |
![]() 2014-09-19 00:04 | While there's no set production number for these, Toyota is expecting about 200 orders a month for one year, so around 2400 or so. Toyota apparently plans to offer this only for that one year and that's it, but I wouldn't be surprised that IF demand exceeds expectations, they might extend it. | |
![]() 2014-08-01 11:50 | It looks the Hiace but it isn't the same car ![]() | |
![]() ![]() 2014-07-07 17:55 | Ford78 wrote Is similiar to an European Corolla. I'm planning to add but I'm not sure if the engines are correct. I found them in: ultimatespecs.com/car-specs/Toyota/M847/Corolla-VIII-3-door ultimatespecs.com/car-specs/Toyota/M849/Corolla-VIII-Sedan You're mistaken. The European Toyota Corolla looks very different. i.wheelsage.org/pictures/toyota/corolla/autowp.ru_toyota_corolla_sedan_33.jpg and i.wheelsage.org/pictures/toyota/corolla/autowp.ru_toyota_corolla_sedan_44.jpg -- Last edit: 2014-07-07 17:56:03 | |
![]() 2014-07-07 15:58 | Is similiar to an European Corolla. I'm planning to add but I'm not sure if the engines are correct. I found them in: ultimatespecs.com/car-specs/Toyota/M847/Corolla-VIII-3-door ultimatespecs.com/car-specs/Toyota/M849/Corolla-VIII-Sedan | |
![]() ![]() 2014-07-07 15:30 | Ford78 wrote Is equal to a Carina E. Carina E has a different grille and front bumper. | |
![]() 2014-07-07 15:05 | Is equal to a Carina E. | |
![]() ![]() 2014-06-11 20:50 | Rinspeed wrote don't know why it could have a problem. I just do a car and there isn't problem It seems to be normal again. Maybe my internet has some issues. | |
![]() ![]() 2014-06-11 19:05 | Desscythe17 wrote There seems to be an error, I've uploaded a better rear picture, and normally when I replace a picture and I reload the page, the new picture is there. But I keep seeing the old picture even though I have reloaded the page a couple of times, and I've tried uploading different pictures. don't know why it could have a problem. I just do a car and there isn't problem | |
![]() ![]() 2014-06-11 18:41 | There seems to be an error, I've uploaded a better rear picture, and normally when I replace a picture and I reload the page, the new picture is there. But I keep seeing the old picture even though I have reloaded the page a couple of times, and I've tried uploading different pictures. | |
![]() ![]() 2013-11-03 09:12 | Desscythe17 wrote I think most of these cars that were added, like this Celica SS-III, RX-7 GT-Limited, Fairlady Z Version S/R, Legacy B4 Blitzen, Impreza WRX Something Something Package don't need their own pages, they could all be on just a page for that generation Celica, RX-7, Fairlady Z, Legacy or Impreza. yes if it's only limited or special editions without real modification, it's doesnt need another page | |
![]() ![]() 2013-09-15 13:46 | Mieguy wrote based on the Granvia. except the optical differences this car has also a Four-Wheel drive It's actually the sister car of the Granvia, which also has 4WD. | |
![]() 2013-09-15 11:30 | based on the Granvia. except the optical differences this car has also a Four-Wheel drive | |
![]() ![]() 2013-06-27 21:50 | nothing, we are doing championship for drivers, no manufacturers | |
![]() 2013-06-27 21:12 | Rinspeed wrote a championship had obligatory points, it's not a championship without points. The "without points" is only for very long race like Dakar OK. I asked it because I was doing the FIA 2-Litre and when I was putting the top 10 drivers each round, it was erased ![]() You told that I had to create a separate page between 2-Litre (8 rounds) and WRC (10 rounds). Yeah, it had obligatory points but only for manufacteurs. What should I have done for 2-Litre Championship? -- Last edit: 2013-06-27 21:21:36 | |
![]() ![]() 2013-06-27 21:08 | Ford78 wrote I have one question: When putting a championship with no points, should I put the top 10 or all registred? a championship had obligatory points, it's not a championship without points. The "without points" is only for very long race like Dakar | |
![]() 2013-06-27 20:39 | I have one question: When putting a championship with no points, should I put the top 10 or all registred? |