Rinspeed wrote
Ok.

Mark0 wrote
Like i had said, i had a lot of work for this moment

Rinspeed if you have time can you extend championship to 38 races?


-- Last edit: 2014-12-09 20:27:19 (Rinspeed)

There doesn't appear to be any big differences, other than the fact that the US spec 500Xs will have the 2.4 Tigershark I4 as an available engine. The 1.4 will be the same in US spec, and there won't be any diesels.

I'd say a separate page wouldn't be necessary, just that when the specs for the Tigershark are out, just list that engine as (USA), like some other cars here have for the US models.

Desscythe17 wrote
Is there differences?
Another thing, sorry, i don't have a lot of time to add cars in this moment because i had a lot of work. SO i do that i can

carcrasher88 wrote
It should have a seperate page, like the American 500 and 500L also have.

This version will be known as the 500X Trekking in the US.

www.fiatusa.com/en/500x/

1982-2009, unchanged!

Now i find that they stop production in 2011. And then resume it in 2012 and stop it again in 2013.

Mark0 this car is always in production?

This is a nice vehicle, I want this car for my collection!

I will add pictures tomorrow.

Rinspeed wrote
Both are 2WD and 4WD, only differences are exterior. According to the Dutch Autoweek that is.

-- Last edit: 2014-11-25 09:02:38

i don't know if the cross is only AWD and if the normal one is only FWD.

It is an rebadged Suzuki SX4.

Congratulations for Lewis Hamilton and Mercedes for the title!

Rinspeed wrote
Yes, apparently terrible design and environmentally friendly are somehow connected...

Kobayashi is also Retired

another horrible looking car...

sajmon14 wrote
I just uploaded the wrong file, don't worry.

wrong dash pic, has a Subaru logo

i390.photobucket.com/albums/oo344/sajmon14/11252D1A-0E84-47D9-85C2-4122633CF236_zpss8y3quk4.jpg

This is a proper one

-- Last edit: 2014-11-23 13:13:08

Rinspeed wrote
Now with the new pics, all the car looks bad lol. Nissan can't do something better than that???

Desscythe17 wrote
There isn't something wrong in the pic. It's just the rear of the car that was bad.

Rinspeed wrote
What part of the rear is bad? I mean, the car looks bad anyway, but is something wrong with the picture?

-I'll upload the Japanese pictures, as they don't have a bodykit like this one.

-- Last edit: 2014-11-20 19:47:57

i don't know if it's the picture but the rear of the car seems really bad

Body reminds me a bit of the Renault Sport Spider

-- Last edit: 2014-11-20 08:45:45

Desscythe17 wrote
For me it's a prototype (same category as concept car). This isn't a production car and there is a lot of exotic cars like that: some anouncment but never released in real.

fck wrote
Wouldn't that make this a production car that is still being tested instead of a concept car?

Desscythe17 wrote

They were just renders.

-- Last edit: 2014-11-18 12:34:10

What was wrong with the old pictures? These have copyright or something on them and have a lot of camouflage on them, which doesn't make the pictures representative for the car.