Commentaires
| Page lie | Auteur | Message |
|---|---|---|
 |   Desscythe17
2025-01-10 21:20 | Sold continuously in Canada though as the Chrysler Grand Caravan. |
|
 flaffel3434
2025-01-10 18:26 | not discontinued, has actually been brought back to the consumer market for the 2025 model year after 3 years of fleet exclusivity it never got the facelift that the pacifica did. -- Last edit: 2025-01-10 18:27:27 |
 |
flaffel3434
2024-12-16 16:28 | just got removed from their site. |
|
flaffel3434
2024-10-31 13:27 | was fleet exclusive in the us for the 2022-2024 model years, but for 2025 has returned to the consumer market |
 | Desscythe17
2023-11-24 16:40 | Early 1965 New Yorkers had taillight covers that makes them appear like clear taillights. Sometime during the model year they got the regular red taillights instead. |
 | Desscythe17
2021-05-28 15:32 | Technically the widebody was available in 1985 already as Dodge and Plymouth, but due to WCS not being able to have 3 brands in one car page, I split the car when it became a Chrysler in 1986. |
 | Desscythe17
2020-08-04 15:46 | For 1965 and 1966, the Newport was called Windsor in Canada. The main difference is that the Windsor was not available as the 6-window Town Sedan. |
 |
carcrasher88
2020-07-21 00:29 | Now THAT is unusual. I mean, the Grand Caravan name has never been associated with the Chrysler brand...why the sudden use as such? Probably would have made more sense to slap a crosshair grille and Dodge badges on it if they were gonna have the nameplate carry on, for proper brand recognition. |
| Desscythe17
2020-07-20 19:02 | Just as the US gets the cheaper trim levels as Chrysler Voyager, Canada will get the same cheaper trim levels as Chrysler Grand Caravan starting from model year 2021. |
|
carcrasher88
2020-06-20 01:27 | All Wheel Drive was made available for the pre-facelift Pacifica, starting in June, as the AWD Launch Edition package for Touring-L trim Pacificas, ahead of the 2021 model year facelift. So, it's an option for non-hybrid models (hybrids have only been offered in Premium and Platinum trims). |
 |
carcrasher88
2020-02-07 05:36 | This updated 2021 Pacifica (no word on if the changes carry over to the new lower priced Voyager, which was just introduced for the 2020 model year) marks the return of all-wheel-drive as an option on a Chrysler minivan for the first time since the RS vans were discontinued. This also gives the Toyota Sienna a bit more competition, as prior to this, the Sienna was the only minivan in the North American market that offered AWD. Also new with the Pacifica for 2021 is the introduction of a new high-end trim package, Pinnacle. I'd imagine it would largely be similar to the Elite trim on the Honda Odyssey, Limited Premium on the Sienna, and SX on the Kia Sedona. -- Last edit: 2020-02-07 05:37:01 |
| Desscythe17
2019-06-28 18:00 | Lower priced trim levels will be renamed Voyager for MY 2020. |
 |
carcrasher88
2018-11-24 03:28 | When people hear the Pacifica nameplate, they think of the mid-00's CUV that used the nameplate, but the reality is...today's Pacifica minivan actually owes it's existence to this concept, based on the Town & Country of the era with LHS styling cues. The Pacifica that went into production 3-4 years later? That draws it's lineage back to the Citadel concept from the same year as this, which evolved into the 2002 Pacifica concept that previewed the production model. Now, the Pacifica nameplate has gone back to it's minivan roots, while the Citadel nameplate has been re-assigned as a top of the line Dodge Durango trim level. Full circle, I'd say. |
 |
carcrasher88
2018-11-24 03:19 | While the California Cruiser didn't go into production, it did have a direct influence on the production vehicle, with the scalloped headlights and round foglamps making their way onto the facelifted 2006 PT Cruiser. |
 | Desscythe17
2018-11-17 15:11 | Renamed Town & Country for MY 2004, ending any reference to the Plymouth brand. |
 |
carcrasher88
2018-01-08 16:50 | Some of the commercials in '93 for the Concorde mentioned some of the same things, but there were multiple versions, longer and shorter, along with a few other different ads as well. |
 |
 Mieguy
2017-12-30 13:20 | Fiat at least earned a small but profitable customer base by selling cheap cars with good equipment features at base. I personally loved the design of the Chrysler 200 and wanted to buy one, but it was too difficult for me to get one (i had to drive to the german harbor of Rostock). If i already knew the car was good i would have bought it anyway, but i dont drive 800 kilometers to Rostock, do a Test Drive and then notice its shit and drive back again... Oh and the new Jeeps are all awful, people who drive them as rental cars in Germany always complain about them. |
|   Mark0
2017-12-30 11:19 | Yeah. Just like you said Chrysler is sinking ship for many years. But this is no way for them to get going again. But again customers who are buying the cars are the key. And just like I said before 70% of them have no idea about cars, they just buying them because A) They heard that make is good or B) Someone on internet i am fan of is driving that car, so I must drive it too. Here is the quote from Tucker: The Man and His Dream movie. "And one day, we're gonna find ourselves at the bottom of the heap, instead of king of the hill, having no idea how we got there; buying our radios and our cars from our former enemies!" This is Tucker speech to the jury back in 50's when he was in the court, and the jury laughed at that comment, and look what car is best seller in US. If the US let smaller manufacturers come with new ideas, instead of focusing on 'Big Three' they will still be on the top of vehicle industry. |
| Desscythe17
2017-12-30 00:42 | Mark0 a crit "It was discontinued due to lack of profitability and as the result of FCAs strategy of exclusively manufacturing trucks in North America." FCA have some very brigh leadership. Mixing US and Italian isn't good thing. Cadillac Allante and Chrysler TC for example. Damn it, Fiat is most common car in Serbia, they have factory here, but people don't like them and are only buying them for low prices. All of Chrysler has been a sinking ship or many many years. I don't think any existing American car manufacturer has been close to bankruptcy as many times as Chrysler. In the 70s, they failed to adapt to the economic situation, and kept building big cars when fuel prices were very high. They partnered with Mitsubishi -> failed. In the 80s, they were saved by a cheap and uninspiring compact car (the K-Car) and bought AMC, which wasn't doing well at all, just so they could have Jeep. In the late 90s, they partnered with Mercedes -> didn't work. At the end of the 2000s, they hit rock bottom and merged with Fiat (which struggles to compete with big corporations like Renault-Nissan, Volkswagen, GM). Now FCA's boss has greatly improved Chryslers when you compare them to the 2000s models, but they aren't competitive at all if you look beyond price (and horsepower in case of Dodge). Dodge and Jeep crossovers are doing very well (funny, because they aren't getting very many facelifts), as the world is crazy about crossovers right now. Chrysler has two cars left (one is outdated, the other in a category that nobody wants anymore). Fiat tries to live off of the 500, which is losing popularity, Lancia is pretty much dead, Alfa Romeo's grand revival isn't exactly going as planned (although the Stelvio does well of course), Maserati has an outdated sports car, some very expensive sedans and a crossover. FCA's boss has also been desperately looking for another corporation to buy all of FCA, which doesn't look very good, while he is trying to make all of his brands to go 100% crossover. Good job! *Both the Chrysler TC and Cadillac Allant were bad ideas because they were built in Italy and imported to the US, which made them ridiculously expensive. I think the Allant could have done reasonably well if it was built in the US instead. -- Last edit: 2017-12-30 00:43:21 |
| Mark0
2017-12-29 19:44 | "It was discontinued due to lack of profitability and as the result of FCAs strategy of exclusively manufacturing trucks in North America." FCA have some very brigh leadership. Mixing US and Italian isn't good thing. Cadillac Allante and Chrysler TC for example. Damn it, Fiat is most common car in Serbia, they have factory here, but people don't like them and are only buying them for low prices. -- Last edit: 2017-12-29 19:44:33 |
 |   JFK
2017-07-01 00:54 | carcrazedalex586 a crit I remember JFK had a Car Spotting photo of this. Why was it deleted? It did not meet the new carspotting standarts. |
 | Desscythe17
2017-05-12 00:55 | carcrazedalex586 a crit Its Dodge cousin somehow has red rear indicator lights and this has orange. They tried so hard to make them look different. |
| Desscythe17
2016-04-10 11:25 | Mark0 a crit The world is going to hell when everybody want to drive some s*itty SUV's... Well the 200 and Dart are only sold in North America as far as I know, but I get your point. Everyone wants crossovers, and driving a normal ("low") car becomes more unpleasant by the day. -- Last edit: 2016-04-10 11:26:13 |
| Mark0
2016-04-10 10:49 | The world is going to hell when everybody want to drive some s*itty SUV's... |
|
carcrasher88
2016-04-10 05:07 | Yep, and in order to replace them, FCA plans to seek out an import partner to manufacturer replacement models. |
| Desscythe17
2016-04-10 00:39 | Well, sadly this car did not become what Chrysler wanted it to be. Together with the Dodge Dart this will likely be discontinued after this year or the next, to make more room for Jeep production. |
 | Desscythe17
2016-03-26 00:23 | If only there was some filthy rich individual who could pay Ghia to replicate this car today. -- Last edit: 2016-03-26 00:24:02 |
| JFK
2016-03-25 22:57 | Gamer a crit I wonder what it looks like today... I bet worse than Miss Belvedere. |
|
Gamer
2016-03-25 22:40 | I wonder what it looks like today... |
 | Desscythe17
2014-04-30 15:01 | Mieguy a crit we also need the european model as it has many differences. Different rear lights, Dodge grille, side indicators. yes, the European Chrysler Voyager was based on the Dodge Caravan. There are more cars like that, for example the European Pontiac Trans Sport is based on the American Oldsmobile Silhouette. |
|
Mieguy
2014-04-30 13:26 | we also need the european model as it has many differences. Different rear lights, Dodge grille, side indicators. |
 | Desscythe17
2014-03-31 18:46 | Rinspeed a crit This isn't the Stratus Cabriolet in Europe? Yes, only the Stratus has EU-spec taillights, which are red, orange and white. |
|   Rinspeed
2014-03-31 18:30 | This isn't the Stratus Cabriolet in Europe? |
| Desscythe17
2014-03-20 22:51 | Mieguy a crit my 1999 chrysler Stratus Interior looks Chrysler-ish enough for me ^^ leather seats, wood and its wide like never ending. This was built until the early 2000s. .gif ";)") The Sebring that succeeded your Stratus was plain awful in my opinion, and the generation after that... well... |
|
Mieguy
2014-03-19 08:11 | Desscythe17 a crit I really hope this car gets Chrysler back on track. Compared to the previous Sebring/200, this car actually has the right to call itself a Chrysler. It's no longer a cheap mid-size car, and the interior looks exactly like what you imagine a Chrysler interior to look like. To be honest, the Chrysler interiors from the early 2000s until Fiat took over were horrible and although the Fiat interiors look nice, this is more like what a Chrysler should have. my 1999 chrysler Stratus Interior looks Chrysler-ish enough for me ^^ leather seats, wood and its wide like never ending. This was built until the early 2000s. |
| Desscythe17
2014-03-15 10:39 | I really hope this car gets Chrysler back on track. Compared to the previous Sebring/200, this car actually has the right to call itself a Chrysler. It's no longer a cheap mid-size car, and the interior looks exactly like what you imagine a Chrysler interior to look like. To be honest, the Chrysler interiors from the early 2000s until Fiat took over were horrible and although the Fiat interiors look nice, this is more like what a Chrysler should have. -- Last edit: 2014-03-15 10:40:10 |
 |
Mieguy
2014-03-10 18:46 | oh you would see it. the 2.5 has a different exhaust and 2.5 was only available for the LX model. I looked on the rear shot of the same car on mobile.de. It has the 2.0 exhaust. |
| Desscythe17
2014-03-10 17:17 | Mieguy a crit yes i have a 4-speed automatic 2.5 V6 EDIT: uh you were talking about the 2.0 LE automatic. Stupid me. But i found a Picture of a 1999 2.0 LE (LX would have leather seating) with automatic on mobile.de too:  But that could be a 2.5 V6 as well, right? I'm not sure if you can tell whether it's a 2.0 or a 2.5 from the interior (or exterior, does it have V6 badges or something?). |
|
Mieguy
2014-03-10 15:29 | yes i have a 4-speed automatic 2.5 V6 EDIT: uh you were talking about the 2.0 LE automatic. Stupid me. But i found a Picture of a 1999 2.0 LE (LX would have leather seating) with automatic on mobile.de too: -- Last edit: 2014-03-10 15:44:50 |
| Desscythe17
2014-03-10 15:11 | Mieguy a crit My sources were: www.auto-data.net/de/?f=showCar&car_id=14720 (listing that Manual had 5 gears and automatic 4 gears) and german Wikipedia Another source is here: www.allpar.com/mopar/5speed.html Wikipedia isn't trustworthy, and the other page also seems to be editible by everyone. So I'm not sure about a 4-speed automatic 2.0 You have a 2.5 V6? |
|
Mieguy
2014-03-10 09:30 | My sources were: www.auto-data.net/de/?f=showCar&car_id=14720 (listing that Manual had 5 gears and automatic 4 gears) and german Wikipedia -- Last edit: 2014-03-10 15:45:18 |
| Desscythe17
2014-03-10 08:51 | Mieguy a crit *sigh* i dont understand that. Added all required things, that car only had 3 engines. 2 ATs and 1 MT. European Version was built in the US and exported to Europe officially by Chrysler. The rear Crash structure of my car even has an "EXPORT" Label. EDIT: Ah i found it, still waiting Approval. ID is 18058. What was your source for the engines? I couldn't find a 2.0 Automatic for the 98-00 years. I've edited the engines a bit, and added an official picture for the front, as it was available. |
|
Mieguy
2014-03-10 08:18 | *sigh* i dont understand that. Added all required things, that car only had 3 engines. 2 ATs and 1 MT. European Version was built in the US and exported to Europe officially by Chrysler. The rear Crash structure of my car even has an "EXPORT" Label. EDIT: Ah i found it, still waiting Approval. ID is 18058. -- Last edit: 2014-03-10 08:21:12 |
| Desscythe17
2014-03-09 23:37 | Mieguy a crit okay i added it and needs confirmation by admins. But I did a mistake. The Seadan was built 1998-2000. Only convertible was built until 2001. I was also not sure about engines. They were taken unchanged from previous generation. So i entered 1995-2000, is that right? I don't see them anywhere, so I don't think they were accepted. |
|
Mieguy
2014-03-09 23:00 | okay i added it and needs confirmation by admins. But I did a mistake. The Seadan was built 1998-2000. Only convertible was built until 2001. I was also not sure about engines. They were taken unchanged from previous generation. So i entered 1995-2000, is that right? -- Last edit: 2014-03-09 23:02:04 |
| Desscythe17
2014-03-09 22:01 | Mieguy a crit sold as Chrysler Stratus in Germany. I own a 1999 model year which is from Switzerland where it was sold too. European version (pictures show my private car):    Actually, you're wrong. The European Chrysler Stratus is based on the American Dodge Stratus (look at the taillights). Because it isn't a Dodge, but also is different from this car, it requires a seperate page, just like the Chrysler Neon and Vision. |
|
Mieguy
2014-03-09 21:30 | sold as Chrysler Stratus in Germany. I own a 1999 model year which is from Switzerland where it was sold too. European version (pictures show my private car): -- Last edit: 2014-03-09 21:37:47 |
 | Rinspeed
2014-03-07 10:03 | Desscythe17, the sebring is sold in France in 2007 (only) with a 2.0 petrol 156 hp and a 2.0 CRD diesel 140 hp. I think it could have be sold more time in other countries in Europe. Could you see that and add them please? |
 | Desscythe17
2014-01-18 23:11 | For a second I thought I made a mistake and gave this car the same front picture as webcarstory.com/voiture.php?id=17662 But they're actually different, haha. |
 | Desscythe17
2014-01-17 17:11 | Some clarification concerning the successors of this car: The M-Body Chrysler LeBaron was downsized to the K-Body in 1981. At the same time, the R-Body New Yorker was downsized and in all fairness, they just put the New Yorker nameplate on the M-Body LeBaron and continued to build it until 1989. The Dodge M-Body counterpart of this car was called the Diplomat, which was built from 1976 until 1989 and confirms the 1976-1981 Chrysler LeBaron and 1981-1989 Chrysler New Yorker/Fifth Avenue to be the same cars. -- Last edit: 2014-01-17 17:12:46 |