Commentaires
| Related page | Author | Message |
|---|---|---|
|
I was only referring to the MK VI and VII.
|
||
|
Gamer wrote
Is no one going to add the Mini? Adding a car like that takes an enormous amount of time, both in searching for information as well as adding all of it. |
||
|
Is no one going to add the Mini?
|
||
|
Mieguy wrote
Okay. But your link still confirms that they have to change the G-Class for these regulations aswell. Quote: "Regulatory changes will force some design modifications for 2016". I didn't say it won't change, but it's certainly not going to be as radical as the Ener-G Force. |
||
|
Okay. But your link still confirms that they have to change the G-Class for these regulations aswell. Quote: "Regulatory changes will force some design modifications for 2016".
|
||
|
Mieguy wrote
Actually thats wrong. Mercedes has to bring a new model because of this new regulations coming into action in 2016. This concept car gives a hint how it would look like: www.spiegel.de/auto/aktuell/studie-ener-g-force-mercedes-enthuellt-moeglichen-g-modell-nachfolger-a-867432.html Jeep Wrangler is okay because this law is only for models sold in europe. The rule says that the front has to be smoother in case of degree in rising higher. So the high front is still possible but has to be rounder. A new Defender could be possible but i think they have so many models in their range that they dont see any reason to keep the Defender. Your link is from two years ago. Autoblog recently posted this: www.autoblog.com/2014/10/21/mercedes-g-class-future-report/ |
||
|
Gamer wrote
Added additional names and changed origin to Spain, it is (essentially) a rebadged Seat Toledo. Changed origin back to China, for obvious reasons. The car was built in China by Chery without approval of Seat/Volkswagen. It might be an obvious Seat Toledo, but it was built from the ground up by Chery using stolen blueprints. -- Last edit: 2014-11-06 22:56:08 |
||
|
Added additional names and changed origin to Spain, it is (essentially) a rebadged Seat Toledo.
-- Last edit: 2014-11-06 22:08:00 |
||
|
Desscythe17 wrote
It's not a big shock. They should have seen this coming ages ago. Mercedes-Benz and Jeep are able to continue the G-Class and Wrangler, so I don't understand why Land Rover thinks they have to discontinue the Defender... Actually thats wrong. Mercedes has to bring a new model because of this new regulations coming into action in 2016. This concept car gives a hint how it would look like: www.spiegel.de/auto/aktuell/studie-ener-g-force-mercedes-enthuellt-moeglichen-g-modell-nachfolger-a-867432.html Jeep Wrangler is okay because this law is only for models sold in europe. The rule says that the front has to be smoother in case of degree in rising higher. So the high front is still possible but has to be rounder. A new Defender could be possible but i think they have so many models in their range that they dont see any reason to keep the Defender if its changed too much. -- Last edit: 2014-11-08 09:51:38 |
||
|
The Black Edition is also available in 90 Version for France
|
||
|
Also 5 Defender 110 Atlantic in France (i d'ont have picture)
|
||
|
Gamer wrote
My mistake "High Gloss" isn't actually part of the name of the color. There are other problems. I had see the site where you had the infos and there is clearly the paint by year so enter them correctly and don't put them 2 times. I erase them for the moment. |
||
|
My mistake "High Gloss" isn't actually part of the name of the color.
-- Last edit: 2014-11-06 08:42:07 |
||
|
Mark0 wrote
They will end production on December 2015 ![]() They say that it's not safety enough for other cars and pedestrians. It's not a big shock. They should have seen this coming ages ago. Mercedes-Benz and Jeep are able to continue the G-Class and Wrangler, so I don't understand why Land Rover thinks they have to discontinue the Defender... |
||
|
They will end production on December 2015
![]() They say that it's not safety enough for other cars and pedestrians. |
||
|
Desscythe17 wrote
And the 2.0 Hybrid isn't in the hatchback or wagon? no only the sedan |
||
|
Rinspeed wrote
Sedan only sold with 2.0 Hybrid in Europe And the 2.0 Hybrid isn't in the hatchback or wagon? |
||
|
Sedan only sold with 2.0 Hybrid in Europe
|
||
|
Exactly, but it's probably the exact reason why it has gotten so far. Nowadays, everyone who drives an Audi A3 thinks he drives an A8. Most people can't tell the difference anyway.
Some cars are completely losing their identity, like the BMW 3/4 Gran Coupé or the Mercedes A/GLA. -- Last edit: 2014-11-04 18:14:56 |
||
|
Agree. I don't get it why every Audi, Skoda, Volkswagen and now BMW and Mercedes-Benz must look the same. I mean if you dont know difference very good you could think that A3,A4,A5 Sportback, A6, A7 and A8 are same car.
|
||
|
Gamer wrote
Oh god, the Nissan Juke is now available as an Infiniti, and looks worse than ever. It's only for China, and the Juke looks cool. If you can't stand difference, stay with Volkswagen. |
||
|
Oh god, the Nissan Juke is now available as an Infiniti, and looks worse than ever.
|
||
|
Still for sale outside North America for now.
|
||
|
Facelifted in 2014.
|
||
|
Desscythe17 wrote
When adding the new Q70 and Q70L, do they need seperate pages? Because I don't think the extended wheelbase is something you see really clearly on the outside. If there isn't a real difference, you can post here |
||
|
Correction: Miguel Barbosa is from Portugal, not Brazil!
|
||
|
Rinspeed wrote
Thanks 2 problem: there is one more result for Ricardo Marques (13 instead of 21) and there is a problem with the last rally because the date is in one week and you had already the results. Ricardo Marques points were corrected. The last rally started in 17 October and it ended in 18 October. Source: ewrc-results.com/season.php?s=2014&nat=18 |
||
|
When adding the new Q70 and Q70L, do they need seperate pages? Because I don't think the extended wheelbase is something you see really clearly on the outside.
|
||
|
Ford78 wrote
Update is done. Final Standings: www.fpak.pt/sites/default/files/competicoes/ralis/campeonato_nacional_de_ralis/classificacoes/6748-cn_ralis_2014_condutores_-_absoluto.pdf Thanks 2 problem: there is one more result for Ricardo Marques (13 instead of 21) and there is a problem with the last rally because the date is in one week and you had already the results. |
||



